
RESOURCES
Giving up control
a Doctrine of '90sManagement must allow adaptation
The first of a three-part series on leadership in the '90s.
FOR THE JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION
By Robert Turknett
Other voices gives the business community an opportunity to speak directly
to Atlanta Journal- Constitution readers. Robert L. Turknett, president
of Turknett Associates Leadership Group, is an executive leadership consultant
and licensed psychologist.
First in Series: How Must Leadership Change?
Fortune magazine called it a revolution. Management guru Peter Drucker
called it a new economic and social order.
Whatever is is, most of us in business recognize we are in the midst of
profound change. Leadership in corporate America must respond to a series
of converging and mutually reinforcing trends that transform the way we
manage our organizations.
Five major trends make leading in the new ecomony challenging. They are
the emergence of the so-called knowledge worker--computer programmers,
systems analysts and medical technicians; powerful peer-to-peer computer
networks; the increasing importance of speed; globalization; and the demise
of the organizational hierarchy.
In the new economy, knowledge--not capital or raw material--is the key
resource. Michael Dell's challenge to IBM from his garage was only the
beginning. Huge, established corporations are feeling the threat of upstarts
with creative ideas, computer savvy and a business bound to the outside
world by computer networks and telecommunications.
Drucker estimates that knowledge workers will make up one-third of the
work force. Frederick Taylor's "scientific management" -- very specialized
jobs with close, direct supervision -- worked well for Henry Ford but
can be disasterous when the environment needs creativity, collaboration
and new ideas.
Future Shock
Futurists 40 years ago foresaw the explosion in computing power, but
they thought the power would be tied to large mainframes. Mainframes keep
power and information stored and controlled at the top. Peer-to-peer netwroks
give everyone access to the same information available to the chief executive
officer.
Organizations can allow people on the front lines to use information to
serve customers quickly.
SynOptics Communications found that delivering mail and files electronically
sped up product development by 24 percent.
Lewaders who are threatened by the openness of networks or by subordinates
having information to make decisions without them will hamstring the business.
Time is the currency of the '90s and the key competitive advantage. Customers
want it yesterday, competitors work to make your new product obsolete
and everyone wants documents delivered by fax. Organizations that make
decisions by funneling problems through corporate layers never can respond
fast enough. Leaders who insist on managing details or signing off on
trivial decisions cripple their companies.
Leaders can no longer look simply at national business cycles, national
currencies or national competitors. When scanning the competitive environment,
their view must be global.
The hierarchy hasn't fallen on its own. It has been decimated by information
technology that makes managers who serve only as information conduits
unnecessary.
Leaders must not only learn to lead without the control and order of the
hierarchy--they often also must face work forces demoralized by corporate
downsizing. The challenge is clear. Leaders must give up command and control
and learn to create adaptive organizations that can respond to constant
change and get the best from everyone.
|